Content
Why "No" and "No" Should Be Different Commands: What Dog Owners Should Know
08.05.2024 14:18
Many dog owners are sure that “no” and “no” are synonymous commands.
In other words, it is widely believed that these exclamations are interchangeable.
In fact, the two popular commands should be used in completely different situations.
Unfortunately, some dog owners do not know about this. As a result, difficulties arise in raising and training the animal.
It also becomes more difficult for the pet: due to the resulting confusion, the four-legged friend may not understand what is wanted from him.
The essence of the "fu" command
This command should only be used when it is necessary to establish a complete ban on the dog that will never be lifted.
For example, a dog started trying to eat stones. Upon hearing "no", the pet should understand: the action must be stopped immediately, it cannot be repeated under any circumstances.
The "no" command is useful in cases where the dog is doing something dangerous or extremely undesirable.
The essence of the command "no"
This command can be described as follows: “For now it is prohibited, but later I may allow it.”
In other words, the command “no” does not mean a categorical ban, but only a temporary one.
Example: a dog started to eat something tasty, but the owner has not yet given such permission. At the same time, the person knows that sooner or later he will allow the dog to start eating.
The main conclusion: do not confuse the commands "no" and "no"! Understand that each of these exclamations has its own meaning.
Earlier we told you how to stop a dog from whining when alone .
